Remote operations in WA have relied on diesel for decades. It’s familiar, controllable, and easy to understand. But as fuel prices fluctuate and ESG expectations rise, many operators are asking: Is a hybrid system worth the complexity?

The answer is: it depends on how you design it—and how long you plan to operate.


The Reality of Diesel-Only Generation

Diesel has strengths:

  • Fast response
  • Simple control structure
  • Proven technology

But in remote WA, the real cost is bigger than the fuel line on a spreadsheet.

Direct and hidden costs:

  • Rising fuel and transport costs
  • High engine hours → frequent overhauls
  • Exposure to supply disruption (weather, logistics, industrial action)
  • Emissions obligations and community expectations

Reliability and logistics

Running a diesel-only station in the Pilbara means:

  • Coordinating fuel deliveries across long supply chains
  • Managing engine wear under constant high load
  • Running redundancy for N-1 security (and paying for it in fuel)

It works, but it’s not always efficient.


What Hybrid Systems Actually Look Like

A modern hybrid system isn’t “a bit of solar bolted on”.

Typically, it includes:

  • Solar PV: Sized to handle a significant portion of daytime load.
  • Battery storage: Smoothing, peak reduction, spinning reserve support.
  • Diesel gensets: Providing firm capacity and backup.
  • Microgrid controller: Orchestrates generation sources, keeps the system stable, and prioritises cheapest energy first.

This architecture lets you treat diesel as a backup and balancing source, rather than the main workhorse.


Cost–Benefit Comparison: Diesel vs Hybrid

Fuel savings and payback

Even a modest hybrid configuration can:

  • Reduce diesel consumption by 20–60%
  • Extend engine maintenance intervals
  • Achieve payback within 3–7 years, depending on site conditions and load profile

The biggest savings come from displaced diesel and avoided maintenance.

Maintenance and lifecycle impacts

Less runtime means:

  • Fewer major overhauls
  • Longer equipment life
  • Reduced need for spare engines on standby

Battery systems require their own lifecycle planning, but with predictable replacement windows and known degradation profiles.

Risk and resilience

Hybrid systems introduce complexity—but designed properly, they reduce operational risk:

  • Multiple generation sources
  • Reduced dependence on a single fuel supply
  • Better tolerance of load variability

The key is proper engineering, modelling and control.


Design Considerations in WA’s North

Designing off-grid energy solutions in WA is not a copy-paste exercise from another region.

You need to consider:

  • Cyclone ratings and structural design
  • High ambient temperatures and derating of equipment
  • Dust and corrosion
  • Seasonal load variation (e.g., wet season vs dry season)

This is where local experience and on-the-ground delivery capability matter.


When Does Hybrid Make Sense?

Hybrid off-grid systems usually make strong sense when:

  • You have a medium- to long-term site life
  • Fuel costs and transport are significant
  • There is a clear decarbonisation or ESG mandate
  • Unplanned downtime is expensive

Diesel-only still has its place—for temporary, mobile or highly flexible operations. But for many remote sites, hybrid is now the default starting point.

GWA designs and delivers off-grid energy solutions tailored to Pilbara and regional WA conditions—from concept through to commissioning and maintenance.